Find viable privacy cases in minutes, not months.
Automated scanning detects CIPA violations, maps them to statutory theories with verified case law, and produces evidence packages for attorney review.
The technical triggers behind the statutes.
Six detection categories mapped directly to CIPA §§631/632/638.51, the Federal Wiretap Act, BIPA, and state two-party consent statutes — the mechanisms courts have already accepted as the basis for class certification.
Hotjar, FullStory, LogRocket, Mouseflow, Microsoft Clarity, Quantum Metric — recording keystrokes, mouse paths, and form inputs in real time.
Meta Pixel, Google Tag, TikTok Pixel, Pinterest Tag, LinkedIn Insight, Snapchat, Klaviyo — firing before consent, transmitting URLs and behavioral signals to third-party ad networks.
Intercom, Drift, Tawk.to, Zendesk, OpenAI & Anthropic widgets recording conversations without disclosure or capture warning.
Behavioral biometrics, typing-cadence fingerprinting, FaceTec/Onfido liveness, voice analytics — collected without the written release BIPA requires.
RTB bid streams, LiveRamp identity resolution, Segment fan-out, Oracle BlueKai, The Trade Desk — mapping every downstream recipient that received intercepted data.
Two-pass scan clicks “Reject all,” reloads, and proves which trackers continue to fire — the Gabrielli v. Haleon fact pattern, automated.
Every detection ships with the underlying HAR capture, full-page and viewport screenshots, a DOM snapshot, timestamped consent-state recordings, and a forensic audit trail of every capture step — the technical foundation your expert needs to authenticate the evidence and your filings need to counter early motions to dismiss and Daubert challenges.
See the full workflow.
From evidence purchase to plaintiff pipeline in 18 seconds.
What a Discover report looks like.
Every report is a complete litigation package. Here's a real example (redacted).
Evidence Package
- HAR network capture (every HTTP request)
- Screenshots: full page, viewport, consent sequence
- DOM snapshot (complete page source)
- Detection report mapping trackers to statutes
Legal Documents (DOCX)
- Research memo built on a human-verified case-law database
- Draft complaint outline with statutory counts
- Pre-litigation demand letter template
- Fact-pattern matching against the post-Popa standing framework
Intelligence
- Damages estimate with per-violation breakdown
- Class size estimate (traffic-based)
- Federal Wiretap Act overlay for nationwide jurisdiction
One scan. A full evidence record.
Deliberize captures the forensic evidence — HAR files, screenshots, DOM snapshots, consent-banner failure proofs, and a full chain of third-party transmissions — and packages it the way you'd hand it to opposing counsel.
55-Signature Detection Engine
Detects tracking pixels, session replay, AI chatbots, fingerprinting, consent gaps, and data exfiltration across any website.
Research Memo + Case Law
Auto-generated memo with violation theories and element-by-element analysis, drawing on a proprietary, human-verified database of case law and pin-cites checked against Westlaw and court records.
Standing Fact-Pattern
Fact-pattern matching to support your post-Popa v. Microsoft standing analysis. Distinguishes content interception from routine tracking and surfaces adverse authority for your review.
Complaint + Demand Letter
Downloadable DOCX with complaint outline, factual allegations, statutory counts, and pre-litigation demand letter template. All documents are drafts requiring attorney review before filing.
Consent Verification
Two-pass scanner clicks Reject All, then re-scans to prove trackers persist. The Gabrielli v. Haleon fact pattern, automated.
Damages Estimation
Per-violation statutory damages, traffic-based class size estimates, and total exposure calculations. State vs. federal court guidance.
From evidence package to class pipeline.
Pick a defendant
Browse 560+ pre-scanned sites filtered by sector, statute, consent posture, and viability score.
Inspect the evidence
HAR captures, screenshots, DOM snapshots, tracker-by-tracker breakdown, and consent-verification results — all timestamped, all forensic-ready.
Unlock the package
Purchase reveals the defendant's identity and the full evidence bundle plus the matching legal kit: draft complaint outline, demand letter template, damages model, and standing fact-pattern.
Open the plaintiff pipeline
Drop a whitelabel Cookie Checker on your firm's site to surface named plaintiffs who actually visited the defendant.
Have a specific target?
Instant access to 560+ pre-scanned reports. Need a custom target? Submit a URL and our engines will scan and verify it within 24 hours. We'll email you the viability score and a redacted preview — the full evidence package (research memo, case law, complaint outline, damages estimate) unlocks at the standard tier price ($499–$2,499 by score), same as every other report in the database.
Find your next class action case.
Browse 560+ pre-scanned websites with real privacy violation data. Unlock individual reports with full case law, legal documents, and attorney-ready evidence.
$999 — Basic viability
$1,999 — Standard
$2,499 — Premium
Priced by litigation viability score
✓ Citations from a human-verified case-law database
✓ Research memo, draft complaint & demand letter
✓ Standing fact-pattern & Rule 23 framework
✓ Screenshots, HAR, DOM evidence
✓ Federal Wiretap Act overlay
Litigation intelligence for plaintiff attorneys.
Deliberize builds litigation intelligence tools for plaintiff attorneys. Our scanning technology combines automated browser forensics with a human-verified case-law database to surface viable privacy cases at scale — the legal judgments are yours to make.